n.panizzianus verses n.pacybolbus

Hi Marilyn & Harold
Following all the discussions about n.panizzianus & n.pacybolbus this is the stock you both saw at Harrogate last year. This stock is widely shown in the UK under the n.pacybolbus flag and I have attached a photo of the vase Terry had in her second place exhibit and there is a slight difference in the form to Janine’s, but they are grown about 150 miles apart in cooler conditions. I believe some of Janine’s stock was from Terry and we will probably continue to show this under the name of pacybolbus until we have evidence with both varieties shown side by side on the same plot. As you all know in any group of species after a period of time there are many different forms all with slight differences – that’s the trouble with splitting -look at n.cordubensis,fernandesii & henriquesii Terry has various clones of each through selection and they could all be given names if the botanists got hold of them.  Look what is happening to the bulbocodium’s.
The answer to most of the problems would be solved if we group similar varieties instead of splitting and by selection the best one for exhibition would excepted form.
See you both next year at Murphys and Terry will try with some manipulation to bring an example
Roger 

The sender has included tags, so you can do more with these photos. Download Photoshop (R) Album Starter Edition-Free!
http://www.adobe.com/aboutstarteredition

2 comments for “n.panizzianus verses n.pacybolbus


  1. Hi Roger,
    I was not on the tour to Harrogate last year. I have no idea what was exhibited. I do know as a fact that the type came from Oran, Algeria not Cypress or Southern Spain. 
    Marilynn
    In a message dated 4/9/2009 10:39:23 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  title= writes:

    Following all the discussions about n.panizzianus & n.pacybolbus this is the stock you both saw at Harrogate last year. This stock is widely shown in the UK under the n.pacybolbus flag and I have attached a photo of the vase Terry had in her second place exhibit and there is a slight difference in the form to Janine’s, but they are grown about 150 miles apart in cooler conditions. I believe some of Janine’s stock was from Terry and we will probably continue to show this under the name of pacybolbus until we have evidence with both varieties shown side by side on the same plot. As you all know in any group of species after a period of time there are many different forms all with slight differences – that’s the trouble with splitting -look at n.cordubensis,fernandesii & henriquesii Terry has various clones of each through selection and they could all be given names if the botanists got hold of them.  Look what is happening to the bulbocodium’s.
    The answer to most of the problems would be solved if we group similar varieties instead of splitting and by selection the best one for exhibition would excepted form.



    New Deals on Dell Netbooks - Now starting at $299

  2. Does anyone grow a genuine Narcissus canariensis, or have a photograph?

     

    James Akers

Comments are closed.