Oregon Daffodil Society Show #2

Some top stems from this second Oregon Daffodil Show held in Albany, Oregon. Overall bloom quality was extremely high. There were 721 blooms at this show and 1138 stems the previous week in Amity.

The Best in Show and Gold Ribbon winner for Theresa Fritchle was Murray Evans lovely Bella Coola 2W-W

Gold Ribbon Bella Coola Albany, Oregon

Gold Ribbon
Bella Coola
Albany, Oregon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The White Ribbon for the Best Vase of 3 stems went to talented exhibitor Peggy Tigner for a lovely vase of 3 of Bill Pannill’s ‘Newport’ 2W-YOY.

White Ribbon Newport 2W YOY

White Ribbon – Newport 2W_YOY
Albany, Oregon 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Best Seedling in Show (Rose Ribbon) was awarded to: V05-115-6 = [(Loch More x Goforit) x Cardinal Knowledge] which is a 2Y-YRR. Steve Vinisky was the exhibitor.

V05-115-6 Best Seedling in Show Albany, OR 2014

V05-115-6
Best Seedling in Show
Albany, OR 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Miniature Gold Ribbon and Miniature Rose Ribbon was awarded to V05-10-13 = Cayenne x N. calcicola which is color coded 2Y-O and measures 38mm in diameter. Steve Vinisky was the exhibitor.

Miniature Gold and Rose Ribbon - Albany, OR  2014

Miniature Gold and Rose Ribbon – Albany, OR 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

The White Ribbon for Miniatures is awarded to the Best Vase of 3 Miniatures in a show. It eas awarded to Narcissus bulbocodium Oregon Strain. Grown and exhibited by Dona Townsend the capable O. D. S. Secretary.

N. bulbocodium Oregon Strain Mini White Ribbon - Albany, OR 2014

N. bulbocodium Oregon Strain Mini White Ribbon – Albany, OR 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

More to follow!

 

 

 

3 comments for “Oregon Daffodil Society Show #2

  1. As administrators of Daffnet, we try to assign categories to Posts to represent their true content so people can search for items of interest without finding everything on Daffnet.  So we would appreciate a thoughtful selection of categories for your future Posts.

    It is better to choose one thoughtful category for a Post rather than all categories.

  2. Thanks for setting me straight. My assumption based on the instructions in step #4 (Find the “Categories” box  to the right and check one or more of the categories that represents the content of your messages.) was that I assigning categories that would or might appeal to certain interested subsets for my posts. I never really knew that I was assigning search criteria. It makes perfect sense now that it is explained. I will certainly be much more thoughtful in any future choices for posts.

    Steve

Comments are closed.