All,
I have found our bulb sales to be a very interesting gauge of public preferences for daffs.
Yes, the Dutch figured out some time ago that big bold and brash catches the public’s eye, esp. if you’re buying to plant in a public garden at the front of the subdivision entrance or some other place where a strong shot of color is in order.
At shows, the public likes one thing but tends to buy something else, to a point.
I cannot sell, and so have put my foot down about ordering for our annual sales, miniatures, cyclamineus, reverse bicolors, and to some degree triandrus and trumpets. They may love ’em at shows, but on tag on a bag they either don’t excite, or look to scary to a joe q. gardener. But they just sit.
Split cups get attraction at shows and are absolutely vacuumed up at our sales. Doubles go quickly too – big bold and a good bang fer yer buck. A frilly Div 2, oh yeah. There’s a growing demand for pinks. And whites… many folks with small yards in subdivisions are contending with half-day shade (from the house, surely ain’t from any trees), and at least in the South there is a strong contingent of “white only/no colors” gardeners. Also in old neighborhoods, tree shade precludes full-sun yellows.
Refined and poised I just can’t sell.
-s
Hi,
I wasn’t going to get into this as it was debated at length on Daffnet a couple of years ago. However to iterate some of my arguments made then.
There is a vast difference between the “public” and daffodil growers who wish to compete on the show benches. The latter group are (if they want to win) controlled by the Judging Manuals of the various societies. It is in relatively recent times that NZ prepared such a manual. It went out to all NDSNZ members for comment. At the end of the process after considerable input from the members it was approved by our AGM. Last year members were asked again if they wanted any changes. Very few submissions (4 in fact) were received. The changes submitted were discussed by the NDSNZ Judging Subcommittee – some were rejected and others will go to this year’s AGM. The rejected ones may reappear at the AGM also. The basic conclusion was that an overwhelming majority of members were happy with the present manual.
So there it is – I will argue for the breeders like Wilson, Richardson, Lea, Duncan, Mitsch, Evans, Crotty to name but a few who were and are looking for new colours, better form (as defined in our present rules), size improved plant vigour, etc etc.
This started as a brief item but I seem to have got a bit carried away – I guess as a compromise we could have classes for spider daffodils (as happens in the orchid world), powder puff daffodils etc etc.
Cheers,
Peter
PS The Editor of the NZ Gardener, NZ’s top circulation garden mag. attended the NDSZ National Show in Christchurch last year. She was so “blown away” (her words) by the advances in form, colour,size shapes etc that she is doing a six page centre spread on daffs in the upcoming issue of her magazine. Perhaps we are on the correct track after all!!
Donna, the old adage that one (wo)man’s trash is another man’s treasure couldn’t be more correct. Please post your disposals to my address, below.
As a public horticulturist, daffodil grower and collector, especially of the decoratives, and as a Libra, I have to say that I appreciate both camps and recognize the need to have both exhibition and decorative flowers in my garden displays and breeding programs… the +/- 1,500 daffodil enthusiasts worldwide who prefer the refined flowers can support the exhibition aspect of the business, and the potential market within the 7.2 billion remaining people on the planet can support the decorative aspect…
Jason